The difference between a multimedia story and a traditional one

I found an interesting and complex story about  the Mexican drug war both in a traditional format and in a really cool multimedia format

The difference between the two stories is striking. The print version is pretty mundane and reads like a normal newspaper story, thereby immediately making me tune out and stop caring. It’s not that the content is uninteresting, in fact I find it very interesting, but the multimedia package seems to drive the story in a way that forces me to pay attention.

So how does this multimedia package do this? I think its main advantage is giving me information in a way that helps me digest it quikly. The tradtional story has a picture and  a little map but, the multimedia one has text, video, stills, animaion, maps, and an easy to follow timeline describing each section. Therefor if, as we discussed, “a picture is worth a thousand words” the multimedia package give me a lot more information in 9 minutes then I could get from spending the same amount of time just reading the story.



Filed under Ian Summers

2 responses to “The difference between a multimedia story and a traditional one

  1. The examples I found are from the New York Times as well but the few that I looked at didn’t have any video. I guess they like to switch it up a bit every now and then.

  2. jordanbergstrom

    I agree! I think the multimedia piece is way better than the written. Interesting story.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s