A picture is worth a thousand words. Well, I suppose. In journalism typically photos accompany words, but not always. If a story is small enough and a photo is too difficult to obtain or editors don’t feel it’s worth the cost, the story will be run independent of a photo or any form of visuals; this especially occurs in online news outlets. A multi-media piece doesn’t get out so easy. A multi media piece requires visuals. Without them, a multimedia piece will not hold the interest of the viewers.

If you’re a dedicated blogger, take a gander at the following article in a multimedia format and a normal, journalistic perspective.

CNN Multimedia piece: http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2009/06/24/ac.shot.tues.cnn

Online Reuters article: http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSTRE55N4VA20090624

While both tell the same story, the CNN version is far more visual and relaxed while the Reuters version certainly doesn’t accomplish as much. I remember reading this story on my phone last week (when the girl accused the artist of tattooing too many stars on her) and I was curious what it looked like. It wasn’t until I saw CNN’s multimedia piece on it did I really get visuals – not just one or two, but enough to really give me an idea what this girl did. The multimedia piece allowed for a redundancy that was effective and not overbearing. If Reuters had been so redundant in print (even online print) with the imagery, the article would have felt tacky and overdone.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Kevin Bronk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s